Difference between revisions of "Talk:Installing Fedora 8 on a ThinkPad T61p"

From ThinkWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Can the same trick of Fedora 7 be applied to Fedora 8 regarding the alsa drivers and the sound buttons?
 
Can the same trick of Fedora 7 be applied to Fedora 8 regarding the alsa drivers and the sound buttons?
  
-- Yes of course, should be working as well.
+
-- Yes of course, should be working as well. --[[User:Thhart|Thhart]] 18:42, 11 January 2008 (CET)
  
 
== 32-bit or 64-bit? ==
 
== 32-bit or 64-bit? ==
Line 7: Line 7:
 
The T61p should work with 64-bit, right? How well does that work? --[[User:Whizkid|Whizkid]] 18:37, 28 December 2007 (CET)
 
The T61p should work with 64-bit, right? How well does that work? --[[User:Whizkid|Whizkid]] 18:37, 28 December 2007 (CET)
  
-- I see no reason to do that, you only have less application support and probably other unknown problems. AFAIK it gives you no markable performance advantages.
+
-- I see no reason to do that, you only have less application support and probably other unknown problems. AFAIK it gives you no markable performance advantages. --[[User:Thhart|Thhart]] 18:42, 11 January 2008 (CET)

Revision as of 18:42, 11 January 2008

Can the same trick of Fedora 7 be applied to Fedora 8 regarding the alsa drivers and the sound buttons?

-- Yes of course, should be working as well. --Thhart 18:42, 11 January 2008 (CET)

32-bit or 64-bit?

The T61p should work with 64-bit, right? How well does that work? --Whizkid 18:37, 28 December 2007 (CET)

-- I see no reason to do that, you only have less application support and probably other unknown problems. AFAIK it gives you no markable performance advantages. --Thhart 18:42, 11 January 2008 (CET)